This blog has moved. Go to for the latest posts.

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

The cost of un-fixed bugs or Good Code on top of Bad Code

While discussing with a colleague we started talking about the costs related to not fixing a bug
immediately (yes, this does mean that you have a way to immediately figure out if you introduced a bug).

The reason for fixing bugs immediately is not only the cost of content switching later on when you have to come back, but it is even more the cumulative cost of fixing all the code you have built on top of the bug you introduced.

Think about it this way. Bug = Bad code. If you have a bug and continue development you are developing working code (good code) on top of that bug (bad code).

When you later on go back to fix the bad code, you will then have to fix all of the good code that is now broken because of the bug fix you introduced.

Software is build in stacks, the lower level affects directly the upper levels (many of them), if you have a bug lower in the stack and then fix it you will have to change all of the upper levels! And that is where the real cost is.

So, if you find a bug, fix it now. If you did not find a bug, think of ways you could find it faster -- before you build good code on top of bad code.

Labels: , , , , , ,

at 10:55
RSS link

Bookmark and Share


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

(c) All rights reserved